Intercultural Service Research: "Customer Service Encounters and Culture"

Read this article, paying particular attention to the two sets of performance gaps mentioned near the end that explain common failures involving intercultural communication in customer service.

What is a service encounter?

  • Dyadic interaction between a customer and a service provider (Surprenant and Solomon,1987, p.87)
  • A period of time during which a consumer directly interacts with a service (Shostack, 1985, p.243). 


What is an intercultural service encounter? 

  • Service encounter is called intercultural if the service provider and the customer involved belong to different cultures (Stauss and Mang, 1999, p.331). 
  • A typical intercultural service encounter is given if a foreign customer (of culture B) consumes a service of domestic provider (of culture A) (Stauss and Mang, 1999, p.331) 


Why does culture matter in the service encounter? 

  • Customers with different cultural backgrounds may have different expectations toward service encounters (Stauss and Mang, 1999).
    • Japanese tourists often complain about European restaurant service as they perceive the service delivery as “slow (Usinier 1996).
  • Rules and expectations related to service encounters are likely to vary considerably across cultures as culture provides the framework for social interaction in a society (Winsted, 1997).
    • East Asian consumers expect higher interactional fairness than their American counterparts (Cultural norms of Asian societies strive to maintain smooth and harmonious relationships and saving face.) (Matilla and Patterson, 2004).
  • Inter-cultural service encounters often lead customers to perceive more problems with services than intra-cultural encounters.
  • If service providers direct their services solely to their domestic market, it follows that in inter-cultural encounter situations the perceived differences may lead to problematic “culture shocks”. (Stauss and Mang, 1999).


Intercultural service failure 

  • Service fails when foreign customers experience service problems in a host cultural setting. 
    • The service provider must attempt to understand foreign expectations if the customer is to be satisfied, which depend on cultural background.
  • Service fails when local customers experience service problems with a foreign service provider. 
    • The service provider must attempt to understand cultural expectations of the host culture. 


Why may Intercultural service encounters fail? (Stauss and Mang, 1999) 

Inter-cultural provider performance gap: the expectations of foreign customers are not met (service provider’s accountability) 

  1. Physical environment gap: e.g. inappropriate design, colors, symbols (Bitner, 1992; Usunier, 1993).
  2. Personnel gap: wrong addressing or an inadequate form of eye contact (Usunier, 1993; Singelis, 1994).
  3. System gap: perceived faults in the service provider’s system.
  4. Co-customer gap: foreign customers in the service contact situation are confronted with other customers who behave in a way that is contradictory to the rules and norms of their home country.

Inter-cultural customer performance gap: customers do not perform their roles “correctly” and thus do not meet the culturally determined expectations of services managers (customer’s accountability). 

  1. The service customer’s physical environment gap: foreign customers are hindered by an unusual layout of the facilities or they make a misinterpretation of signs and symbols.
  2. A service customer’s personnel gap: foreign customers violate expectations regarding consumer behavior in personal interactions (Furnham and Bochner, 1994).
  3. A service customer’s system gap: foreign customers are not familiar with the service systems of the service provider and, therefore , are not able to perform correctly from the service provider's point of view.
  4. The co-customer gap of the foreign service: customer manifests himself with a behavior that is perceived as disturbing and embarrassing by domestic customers,
Last modified: Friday, May 5, 2017, 1:20 PM