<<Up     Contents

Wikipedia:Pages needing attention

Redirected from Simon J Kissane/Pages to be rewritten or deleted

Wikipedia:Index > Wikipedia:Pages needing attention
Of course, every entry on Wikipedia deserves attention. But some entries deserve tender loving attention. If you come across a page that you think needs a lot of work, but have no idea how to approach it, list it here so that others can find it.

Do not add articles in the following categories:

Newly created articles and ancient pages frequently require loving attention as well.

Please date your entries here. This makes it easier to judge when pages no longer need attention. Undated entries may be arbitrarily removed. You can sign and add the date at the same time by inserting ~~~~ (four tildes).

Please indicate the reason for listing a page. Pages listed with no reason given may be arbitrarily removed.

Consider adding a WikiMoney bounty for people who fix a problems that you've flagged up here. A code of honour applies -- for each time you add an article to this list, try to fix an article already on the list.

See also: Wikipedia:reference desk, current events, Wikipedia:Requested articles, Wikipedia:Americocentrism

Table of contents

Articles that have good information, but need work for some reason

Subtly wrong

Larry's Text

Articles needing a rewrite

Articles that need periodic updates

Some articles contain list or table with annual data. They need to be updated and review periodically. Some popular pages may be edited frequently between reviews, so they may be up to date when the review is up. But some less popular pages may not be updated periodically without a scheduled review. This section maintains a schedule to make sure these articles are not forgotten and become obsolete over time. Please reset the alarm clock after each review and reorder them chronologically.

Overdue items

Future Items

Articles of dubious merit, accuracy and/or validity

Files relating to Wikipedia Operations

Links and redirects that need fixing

Files containing prehistoric discussions

Much of the content here is based on long abandoned ideas. Old old hands may have better background to know what should happen to this stuff

Needs discussion regarding its format

Other Wikipedia Utilities

wikipedia.org dumped 2003-03-17 with terodump