<<Up     Contents

Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

Redirected from MBTI

The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (or MBTI) is a personality test designed to assess psychological type. It was developed by Katherine Briggs[?] and her daughter Isabel Myers[?] during World War II. The use of type follows from the theories of Carl Jung.

The test asks subjects a number of questions about themselves. Based on the replies, four binary decisions are made about each subject:

In Myers-Briggs' system, each of these dichotomies has specific, non-normative meanings. Quite often any particular person can act in any way, but prefers particular ways.

This process results in a classification into one of sixteen types. Overall the population breakdown by type is:

ISFJ - 13.8% ISFP - 8.8% INFP - 4.4% INTP - 3.3%
ESFJ - 12.3% ESFP - 8.5% ENFP - 8.1% ENTP - 3.2%
ISTJ - 11.6% ISTP - 5.4% INFJ - 1.5% INTJ - 2.1%
ESTJ - 8.7% ESTP - 4.3% ENFJ - 2.4% ENTJ - 1.8%
Totals: SJ - 46.4% SP - 27.0% NF - 16.3% NT - 10.3%
Source: http://www.trytel.com/~jfalt/Tables/stats.html

These are clustered into four temperaments: SJ, SP, NT, and NF.

The MBTI is popular with recruiters and managers, because studies using this assessment show clusters of different personality types in different professions. For instance, the proportion of engineers who are INTJ is higher than the 2% found in the general population.

There are significant differences by sex, especially on the T vs. F distribution.

Almost all arguments between people tend to be manifestations of a type conflict (e.g. P vs J, T vs F, E vs I, S vs N). The P-J conflict tends to be the most glaring - one person gets mad when the rules are broken and the other gets mad when rules are made. The T-F conflict is another one that's very easy to spot - most husband/wife jokes come from this.

Skeptical view of the MB Type Indicator

Skeptics, including many psychologists, argue that MBTI has not been validated by double-blind tests[?] (In which participants accept reports written for other participants, and are asked whether or not the report suits them) and thus does not qualify as a scientific assessment. Some even demonstrate that profiles can apparently seem to fit any person by confirmation bias, ambiguity of basic terms and the Byzantine complexity[?] that allows any kind of behavior to fit any personality type. See [1] (http://skepdic.com/myersb.html) for an extensive skeptical treatment of the subject.

External links

wikipedia.org dumped 2003-03-17 with terodump