Newsgroups: alt.activism,alt.censorship,alt.flame,alt.society.civil-liberty,misc.legal,news.admin.policy
Path: news.csc.fi!news.funet.fi!sunic!sunic.sunet.se!trane.uninett.no!nac.no!Norway.EU.net!EU.net!news.sprintlink.net!noc.netcom.net!netcom.com!sglines
From: sglines@netcom.com (Steve Glines)
Subject: limited followup groups
Message-ID: <sglinesD8szyL.H14@netcom.com>
Followup-To: alt.test
Organization: NETCOM On-line Communication Services (408 261-4700 guest)
References: <3p90n7$d45@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> <demitrioD8npo5.3oF@netcom.com> <3peep7$1gbe@bigblue.oit.unc.edu> <3petvu$36c@elxr.jpl.nasa.gov>
Date: Fri, 19 May 1995 02:23:08 GMT
Lines: 27
Sender: sglines@netcom18.netcom.com
Xref: news.csc.fi alt.activism:90279 alt.censorship:47936 alt.flame:174808 alt.society.civil-liberty:27556 misc.legal:99623 news.admin.policy:30260

In article <3petvu$36c@elxr.jpl.nasa.gov>,
Dave Hayes <dave@elxr.jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
>Paul.Lambert@launchpad.unc.edu (Paul Lambert) writes:
>>  I'm baffled that a select few are still defending Keegan.  I've
>>been following this brouhaha ever since Keegan's flame war with
>>Paul Gregg on Nyx last year.  Keegan has never shown himself to
>>be interested in solving any problems, only in drawing attention
>>to himself and in getting his way.
>
>That is no reason to count or discount claims that he makes about
>censorship. Some of us have never seen him post. It's a large net
>out there. 
>
>Assuming you care, tell me why I should believe you and not him.
>-- 
>Dave Hayes -- Institutional NETworks - Section 394 -- JPL/NASA - Pasadena CA
>dave@elxr.jpl.nasa.gov       dave@jato.jpl.nasa.gov         ...usc!elroy!dxh
>
>   If your own vice happens to be the search for virtue,
>                                                   recognize that it is so.

can we take this elsewhere?
-- 

Steve Glines
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
<A HREF="ftp://ftp.netcom.com/pub/sg/sglines/homep.html">
My Home Page</A>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=